Glossary > EN 10204
EN 10204 defines the types of test certificates for metallic products and specifies the evidence a manufacturer must provide regarding conformity, the tests performed, and the traceability of a material. The standard distinguishes between four types of certificates—2.1, 2.2, 3.1, and 3.2—with progressively increasing levels of testing depth and independence of the certifying body.
Publisher: European Committee for Standardization (CEN)
Current edition: DIN EN 10204:2005
The standard applies to manufacturers of metal products—steel mills, rolling mills, foundries, and forges—as well as to all companies along the downstream supply chain that must provide material certificates for the materials they use or require them from their suppliers. Virtually every industry involving metal fabrication is affected: automotive suppliers, metal fabricators, plant manufacturers, aerospace suppliers, and the steel construction industry.
Certificate 2.1: Simple declaration of conformity by the manufacturer without test results
Certificate 2.2: Declaration of conformity with test results from non-specific, ongoing tests
Certificate 3.1: Acceptance test report with specific test results for the delivered product, confirmed by a person from the manufacturer who is independent of the production department
Certificate 3.2: Acceptance test report as in 3.1, additionally countersigned by an independent body of the purchaser or a notified body
Traceability: Unambiguous assignment of the certificate to the specific batch or melt
Chemical and mechanical properties: documented analytical values and test results depending on the type of certificate
The key difference lies in the relationship of the test to the specific product and in the degree of independence: Certificates 2.1 and 2.2 are based on general, non-product-specific tests of the ongoing manufacturing process and are issued by the manufacturer itself. Certificates 3.1 and 3.2, on the other hand, refer to specific tests performed on the actual product delivered—in the case of 3.1, confirmed by an independent person within the manufacturer’s facility, and in the case of 3.2, additionally confirmed by an external body designated by the customer. Which type of certificate is required is usually determined by downstream standards such as EN 1090, PED, or customer-specific specifications, not by EN 10204 itself.
If the required type of certification is missing or cannot be fully traced back to a batch, the component may not be accepted during certification audits in accordance with EN 1090, PED, or AS9102—with immediate consequences for construction acceptance and series production approvals. In safety-critical applications, such as pressure equipment or load-bearing structures, a lack of material certification further complicates the root cause analysis in the event of damage and can exacerbate liability consequences.
EN 1090 – Execution of Steel and Aluminum Structures
ISO 3834 – Quality Requirements for Fusion Welding
PED 2014/68/EU – Pressure Equipment Directive
AS9102 – First Article Inspection
Not directly, but often indirectly through standards such as EN 1090 or PED, which require a specific type of certification.
Increasing level of scrutiny and independence: from a simple declaration of conformity (2.1) to a product-specific audit with external co-signature (3.2).
For safety-critical components, such as those in load-bearing structures, pressure vessels, or the aerospace industry.
The material manufacturer; in section 3.2, additionally an independent body designated by the purchaser.
The key operational challenge is ensuring a seamless link between the material batch, the certificate, and the component manufactured from it—often across many manufacturing steps. Connected worker platforms such as weasl automatically link incoming material certificates to the respective batch and ensure that the correct certificate remains uniquely assignable at every subsequent manufacturing step.
Learn more about weasl and download our product flyer now.